Assessing waterlogging tolerance in jute genotypes through leaf growth traits, chlorophyll retention, and stress tolerance index

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55779/nsb18212877

Keywords:

Corchorus capsularis, Corchorus olitorius, leaf morphology, leaf physiology, leaf growth, genetic variability, waterlogging duration

Abstract

Waterlogging is a major abiotic stress limiting jute production in many jute-grown regions of the world. This study aimed to clarify the leaf morphological and physiological responses of jute plants at early seedling stage under waterlogging stress. In the present study, seven jute genotypes were evaluated under control conditions and three waterlogging durations (20, 40, and 60 days) to assess genotypic variation in leaf morpho-physiological traits. The experiment was conducted in a factorial design with two factors and three replications, where one factor consisted of seven jute genotypes and the other consisted of waterlogging treatments. The results demonstrated that increasing the duration of waterlogging stress progressively intensified the adverse effects on leaf-related traits. At 60 days of waterlogging stress, leaf number (35%), leaf length (30%), leaf breadth (25%), leaf area (47%), SPAD value (27%), leaf fresh weight (10%), leaf dry weight (17%), specific leaf area (35%), leaf area index (66%) and petiole length (24%) were significantly reduced, whereas specific leaf weight increased by 160%. Stress tolerance index showed strong positive correlations with leaf expansion, leaf biomass, leaf thickness and chlorophyll retention. Among the tested genotypes, A-2446, A-3539, and CVL-1 exhibited comparatively lower reductions in leaf growth, leaf thickness, and chlorophyll content and were therefore classified as waterlogging tolerant. In contrast, A-1216, A-3343, TP-3, and A-1770 showed the higher reductions in leaf size traits, biomass-related parameters, and photosynthetic indicators (SPAD values), together with lower stress tolerance indices, particularly under prolonged waterlogging stress (60 days), and were thus classified as waterlogging sensitive. The observed genetic variation among the genotypes suggests that the tolerant lines could be utilized in breeding programs aimed at improving jute performance under waterlogging-prone conditions.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ahmed B, Hasan F, Tabassum A, Ahmed R, Hassan R, Amin MR, Alam M (2023). Genome‑wide investigation of SnRK2 gene family in two jute species: Corchorus olitorius and Corchorus capsularis. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, 21: 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43141-022-00453-x

Ahmed SSU, Tasnime N, Mukul MM, Fatema K, Hasan M, Alam N, et al. (2025). Growth performance of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius) under waterlogging stress in tropical monsoon climate region. International Journal of Agricultural and Applied Sciences, 6(1): 67-73.https://doi.org/10.52804/ijaas2025.6110

Ai H, Bellstädt J, Bartusch K, Eschen-Lippold L, Babben S, Balcke G, et al. (2023). Auxin-dependent regulation of cell division rates governs root thermomorphogenesis. The EMBO Journal, 42: e111926. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.2022111926

Akter S, Sadekin MN, Islam N (2020). Jute and jute products of Bangladesh: contributions and challenges. Asian Business Review, 10(3): 143-152. https://doi.org/10.18034/abr.v10i3.480

Alam SB, Sultana N, Zannat JS, Naher N (2024). Waterlogging effect on growth, yield and physiological responses of blackgram (Vigna mungo L.) genotypes. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment, 17(2): 213-222. https://doi.org/10.55706/jae1737

Anam S, Rahman MA, Hassan MA (2024). Decoding the mystery of Bangladesh's jute decline: a climate crisis or plastic predicament. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 24: 100521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2024.100521

Basavaraj PS, Jangid KK, Babar R, GanganaGowdra VM, Gangurde A, Shinde S, Tripathi K, Patil D, Boraiah KM, Rane J, Harisha CB, Halli H, Sammi Reddy K, Prabhakar M (2024). Adventitious root formation confers waterlogging tolerance in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 8: 1373183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2024.1373183

Bashar K, Tareq Z, Kabir S, Hossain MS, Ahmed R, Ahmed B, Islam MS (2023). Comparative transcriptomics discovers the genetic basis of contrasting waterlogging tolerance between two cultivated jute species. Industrial Crops and Products, 199: 116701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116701

Beegum S, Truong V, Bheemanahalli R, Brand D, Reddy V, Reddy KR (2023). Developing functional relationships between waterlogging and cotton growth and physiology-towards waterlogging modeling. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14: 1174682. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1174682

Ceusters J, Van de Poel B (2018). Ethylene exerts species-specific and age-dependent control of photosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 176(4): 2601-2612. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.01706

Chen S, de Boer HJ, Ten Tusscher K (2025). A minimal mechanistic model of plant responses to oxygen deficit during waterlogging. Quantitative Plant Biology, 6: e22. https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2025.10016

Chen Y, Zhang H, Chen W, Gao Y, Xu K, Sun X, Huo L (2024). The role of ethylene in the regulation of plant response mechanisms to waterlogging stress. Plant Cell Reports, 43(12): 278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-024-03367-9

Choudhury S, Kayes A, Rahman N, Ahmmad S, Islam N, Shawon TA (2025). Effect of waterlogging at different growth stages on growth, yield and biochemical characteristics of brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). European Journal of Applied Sciences, 13(01): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1017/qpb.2025.10016

Enkhbat G, Ryan MH, Nichols PGH, Foster KJ, Inukai Y, Erskine W (2022). Petiole length reduction is an indicator of waterlogging stress for Trifolium subterraneum ssp. yanninicum. Plant and Soil, 475: 645–667. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05404-6

Gadol N, Shah A, Mishra P, Priya G, Vishwakarma H, Singh A, Kumar R, Rao M, Singh N, Parimalan R, Yadav R, Kalia S, Rai V (2025). Identification of potential waterlogging-tolerant accessions of sesame (Sesamumindicum L.) from diverse germplasm in a quest for resilient crops. Plant Genetic Resources, 23: 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262125000139

Gao M, Gai C, Li X, Feng X, Lai R, Song Y, Zeng R, Chen D, Chen Y (2023). Waterlogging tolerance of Actinidiavalvata Dunn is associated with high activities of pyruvate decarboxylase, alcohol dehydrogenase and antioxidant enzymes. Plants, 12: 2872. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12152872

Geng R, Xu M, Xu L, Yan G, Cai G (2026). Biological mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment, 49(2): 685-699. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.70241

Jagodzik P, Tajdel-Zielinska M, Ciesla A, Marczak M, Ludwikow A (2018). Mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades in plant hormone signaling. Frontiers in Plant Science, 9: 1387. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.01387

Karim M, Rahman L, Ferdush J, Tareq Z, Mukul M, Himel R (2020). Yield, quality and cost of jute (Corchorus species) seed production as influenced by herbicide application time. International Journal of Advanced Geosciences, 8: 153-159. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijag.v8i2.31012

Kashtoh H, Baek KH (2021). Structural and functional insights into the role of guard cell ion channels in abiotic stress-induced stomatal closure. Plants, 10: 2774. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10122774

Krishnamurthy SL, Sharma S, Gautam R, Mishra V (2014). Path and association analysis and stress indices for salinity tolerance traits in promising rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes. Cereal Research Communications 42: 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1556/CRC.2013.0067

Kumar B, Kumar K, Kumar A, Lahkar C, Yankanchi S, Singh R, Kumar B, Pandey P, Jat HS (2026). Unravelling tissue-specific transcriptional response for waterlogging tolerance in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Stress, 19: 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2025.101190

Langan P, Bernád V, Walsh J, Henchy J, Khodaeiaminjan M, Mangina E, Negrão S (2022). Phenotyping for waterlogging tolerance in crops: current trends and future prospects. Journal of Experimental Botany, 73(15): 5149-5169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erac243

Li G, Wei N, Hou H (2025). Uncovering the secrets of how plants adapt to water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.15571

Lin C, Zhang Z, Shen X, Liu D, Pedersen O (2024). Flooding-adaptive root and shoot traits in rice. Functional Plant Biology, 51(1): FP23226. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP23226

Linh MN, Thuc LV, Sakagami JI, Orgill S, Van TH, Khuong NQ, Nhan PP (2021). Effects of waterlogging on the growth of different varieties of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). International Journal of Plant Research, 11(1): 1-6. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.plant.20211101.01

Manghwar H, Hussain A, Alam I, Khoso MA, Ali Q, Liu F (2024). Waterlogging stress in plants: Unraveling the mechanisms and impacts on growth, development, and productivity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 224: 105824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2024.105824

Menon-Martínez FE, Grimoldi AA, Striker GG, Di Bella CE (2024). Changes in morphological traits associated with waterlogging, salinity and saline waterlogging in Festuca arundinacea. Functional Plant Biology, 51: FP23140. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP23140

Min CW, Yoon IK, Kim MJ, Jung JS, Rahman MA, Lee BH (2025). Effects of waterlogging at different developmental stages on growth, yield and physiological responses of forage maize. Agronomy, 15(10): 2389. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15102389

Mohammad M, Nishu N (2021). State-owned jute mills in Bangladesh: problems and possible way-out. International Journal of Business and Management, 16: 63-63. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v16n4p63

Moniruzzaman SM, Alam MJ, Sharma D, Begum IA, OspinaPatino MT, McKenzie AM (2024). Value chain analysis of jute fiber in Bangladesh. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10: 101088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101088

Oishy MN, Shemonty NA, Fatema SI, Mahbub S, Mim EL, Raisa MBH, Anik AH (2025). Unravelling the effects of climate change on the soil-plant-atmosphere interactions: a critical review. Soil & Environmental Health, 3(1): 100130.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seh.2025.100130

Olorunwa OJ, Adhikari B, Brazel S, Bheemanahalli R, Barickman TC, Reddy KR (2023). Waterlogging stress reduces cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) genotypes growth, seed yield, and quality at different growth stages: Implications for developing tolerant cultivars under field conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 284: 108336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2023.108336

Oluwole SO, Ogun ML, Arowosegbe S, Osonubi O, Osinaike TS, Sanni AA (2020). Effects of waterlogging on the growth and chlorophyll content of Ixora coccinea Lin. (Jungle Flame). International Journal of Plant Research, 10(1): 17-26. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.plant.20201001.03

Panozzo A, Dal Cortivo C, Ferrari M, Vicelli B, Varotto S, Vamerali T (2019). Morphological changes and expressions of AOX1A, CYP81D8, and putative PFP genes in a large set of commercial maize hybrids under extreme waterlogging. Frontiers in Plant Science, 10: 62. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00062

Qiu K, Li Z, Yang Z, Chen J, Wu S, Zhu X, Gao S, Gao J, Ren G, Kuai B, Zhou X (2015). EIN3 and ORE1 accelerate degreening during ethylene-mediated leaf senescence by directly activating chlorophyll catabolic genes in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genetics, 11(7): e1005399. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005399

Rahman K, Ahmed N, Raihan MRH, Nowroz F, Jannat F, Rahman M, Hasanuzzaman M (2021). Jute responses and tolerance to abiotic stress: mechanisms and approaches. Plants, 10: 1595.https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081595

Rahman MA, Rahman MN (2024). Climatic adaptation and sustainability of jute (Corchorus spp.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Engineering, 6(2): 80–95. https://doi.org/10.48309/JASE.2024.446682.1043

Rahman MT (2017). Role of agriculture in Bangladesh economy: uncovering the problems and challenges. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 6(7): 36-46.

Ren H, Zhou P, Zhou B, Li X, Wang X, Ge J, Ding Z, Zhao M, Li C (2023). Understanding the physiological mechanisms of canopy light interception and nitrogen distribution characteristics of different maize varieties at varying nitrogen application levels. Agronomy, 13: 1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13041146

Ritonga FN, Zhou D, Zhang Y, Song R, Li C, Li J, Gao J (2023). The roles of gibberellins in regulating leaf development. Plants, 12: 1243. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12061243

Sachdev S, Ansari SA, Ansari MI, Fujita M, Hasanuzzaman M (2021). Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: generation, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants, 10(2): 277. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10020277

Schweiger R, Maidel A-M, Renziehausen T, Schmidt-Schippers R, Müller C (2023). Effects of drought, subsequent waterlogging and redrying on growth, physiology and metabolism of wheat. Physiologia Plantarum, 175: e13874. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13874

Sharma S, Bhatt U, Sharma J, Kalaji HM, Mojski J, Soni V (2022). Ultrastructure, adaptability, and alleviation mechanisms of photosynthetic apparatus in plants under waterlogging: a review. Photosynthetica, 60(3): 430-444. https://doi.org/10.32615/ps.2022.033

Sharma S, Sharma J, Soni V, Kalaji HM, Elsheery NI (2021). Waterlogging tolerance: a review on regulative morpho-physiological homeostasis of crop plants. Journal of Water and Land Development, 49(4-6): 16-28. https://doi.org/10.24425/jwld.2021.137092

Sharmin RA, Karikari B, Bhuiyan MR, Kong K, Yu Z, Zhang C, Zhao T (2024). Comparative morpho-physiological, biochemical, and gene expressional analyses uncover mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in two soybean introgression lines. Plants, 13(7): 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13071011

Sherpa D, Kumar S, Mishra S (2024). Response of transient soil waterlogging on shoot growth pattern and root architecture of finger millet and barnyard millet seedlings. Plant Science Today, 11(4): 1510–1518. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.4121

Shi F, Pan Z, Dai P, Shen Y, Lu Y, Han B (2023). Effect of waterlogging stress on leaf anatomical structure and ultrastructure of Phoebe sheareris seedlings. Forests, 14: 1294. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071294

Singh SP, Setter TL (2017). Effect of waterlogging on element concentrations, growth and yield of wheat varieties under farmer’s sodic field conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 87: 513-520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40011-015-0607-9

Somaddar U, Mia S, Khalil MI, Sarker UK, Uddin MR, Kaysar MS, Chaki AK, Robin AHK, Hashem A, Saha G (2023). Effect of reproductive stage-waterlogging on the growth and yield of upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plants, 12(7): 1548. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12071548

Song S, Zhou H, Luo Y, Yu S, Su D, Zheng D, Zhang Z, Luo Z, Liu B, Lin Z, Lin D (2025). Effects of waterlogging at different duration on growth and physiological characteristics of Cenchrus fungigraminus. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 231: 106096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2025.106096

Sun D, Lei Z, Flexas J, Jiang C, Li Z, Ding H, Liu F, Wan Y, Zhang W, Carriquí M, Zhang Y (2025). Altered cell wall properties in domesticated cotton enhance CO₂ diffusion conductance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 77(4): 1168–1180. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf441

Tong C, Hill CB, Zhou G, Zhang XQ, Jia Y, Li C (2021). Opportunities for improving waterlogging tolerance in cereal crops physiological traits and genetic mechanisms. Plants, 10: 1560. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081560

Wu Y, Ma Q, Zhen Z, Chu R, Hu C (2024). The effect of short-term waterlogging stress on the response mechanism of photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence, and yield components during the podding stage in peanuts. Agronomy, 14: 2232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14102232

Xu Z, Ye L, Shen Q, Zhang G (2024). Advances in the study of waterlogging tolerance in plants. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 23(9): 2877-2897.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.12.028

Yang L, Li N, Liu Y, Miao P, Liu J, Wang Z (2023). Updates and prospects: morphological, physiological, and molecular regulation in crop response to waterlogging stress. Agronomy, 13: 2599. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13102599

Yasmin S, Moniruzzaman M (2024). Forecasting of area, production, and yield of jute in Bangladesh using Box-Jenkins ARIMA model. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 16: 101203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101203

Yumnam S, Sawarkar A, Mukherjee S (2017). Response to water stress on some seedling characters of tossa jute (Corchorus olitorius L.). Journal of Crop and Weed, 13(3): 135-143.

Yun P, Solis CA, Shahzad B, Shabala L, Zhou M, Venkataraman G, Chen ZH, Shabala S (2025). Chloride-dependent plasma membrane hyperpolarization confers superior salinity tissue tolerance in wild rice Oryza coarctata. The Crop Journal, 13(3): 740-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2025.04.002

Zeng R, Chen T, Wang X, Cao J, Li X, Xu X, Chen L, Xia Q, Dong Y, Huang L, Wang L, Zhang J, Zhang L (2021). Physiological and expressional regulation on photosynthesis, starch and sucrose metabolism response to waterlogging stress in peanut. Frontiers in Plant Science, 12: 601771. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.601771

Zhang L, Ibrahim AK, Niyitanga S, Zhang L, Qi J (2019). Jute (Corchorus spp.) breeding. Advances in Plant Breeding Strategies: Industrial and Food Crops. Springer Cham, 85-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23265-8_4

Zhang TY, Li ZQ, Zhao YD, Shen WJ, Chen MS, Gao HQ, Ge XM, Wang HQ, Li X, He JM (2021). Ethylene-induced stomatal closure is mediated via MKK1/3–MPK3/6 cascade to EIN2 and EIN3. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 63: 1324–1340. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.13083

Zhang Y, Chen X, Geng S, Zhang X (2025). A review of soil waterlogging impacts, mechanisms, and adaptive strategies. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16: 1545912. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1545912

Zhang Y, Wang X, Malko MM, Zhou Q, Cai J, Zhong Y, Huang M, Jiang D (2025). The physiological mechanisms of waterlogging priming on aerenchyma formation in secondary roots of wheat under waterlogging stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 237: 106207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2025.106207

Zheng H, Zhang Q, Liu Q, Li J, Zhang Y, Wang L, Gao J (2025). Auxin biosynthesis, transport, signaling, and its roles in plant leaf morphogenesis. Plants, 15(1): 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15010072

Zhu J, Zhang Y, Zhang M, Hong Y, Sun C, Guo Y, Yin H, Lv C, Guo B, Wang F, Xu R (2025). Natural variation and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing demonstrate the role of a group VII ethylene response factor, HvERF62, in regulation of barley waterlogging tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 76(17): 5071-5085. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eraf101

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Nizam, R., Mahmud, J. A., Shamsuzzaman, A., Ahamed, K. U., Islam, M. M., & Hasanuzzaman, M. (2026). Assessing waterlogging tolerance in jute genotypes through leaf growth traits, chlorophyll retention, and stress tolerance index. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 18(2), 12877. https://doi.org/10.55779/nsb18212877

Issue

Section

Research Articles
CITATION
DOI: 10.55779/nsb18212877

Most read articles by the same author(s)