Agromorphological and phenological diversity of Algerian peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55779/nsb18112817Keywords:
agronomic performance, Algerian peanut landraces, botanical varieties, maturity duration, morphological characteristics, phenotypic characterization, yield componentsAbstract
Despite a long history of cultivation, the genetic diversity of Algerian peanuts remains largely unexplored, and the country imports four times its national production. This study represents one of the first field evaluations of Algerian peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm, assessing the agronomic performance and morpho-phenological characteristics of local genotypes. Eleven genotypes from northern and southern Algeria were evaluated using a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replicates. Nine morpho-phenological descriptors and 24 agronomic variables, including 17 direct measurements and seven derived ratios, were recorded for characterization. The genotypes differed in growth habit, branching pattern, pod characteristics, and timing of flowering and maturity. Days to 50% flowering ranged from 25 to 31 days after emergence, while pod maturity duration spanned nearly 60 days (104 to 163 days). Separate ANOVAs revealed highly significant differences (p < 0.001) for most traits. Yield components exhibited the highest coefficients of variation (CV: 27.75-30.01%), while derived ratios generally had lower CVs than their component traits, except for the stem-to-width and stem-to-lateral ratios (CV ≈ 27%). Cluster analysis grouped the genotypes into three main clusters. Late-maturing spreading genotypes (A3, A6) had shorter main stems (24.49-25.89 cm), longer primary laterals (59.74-65.45 cm) at maturity, resulting in greater plant width, correlated with higher pod yields (50.37 g plant⁻¹ for A6). Early-maturing upright genotypes (A9, A10, A11) showed higher stem-to-lateral ratios but lower pod yields. Notably, genotype A4 combined early maturity (104 days) with a high 100-seed weight (74.94 g). This study provides well-characterized germplasm to support varietal selection and production diversification.
Metrics
References
Arya SS, Salve AR, Chauhan S (2016). Peanuts as functional food: a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology 53(1):31-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2007-9
Bakal H, Arioglu H (2021). Determination of some agronomic and quality traits of peanut varieties with different pod characteristics at different harvesting times in main crop growing season. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 26(1):79-87. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.943931
Bertioli DJ, Seijo G, Freitas FO, Valls JFM, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Moretzsohn MC (2011). An overview of peanut and its wild relatives. Plant Genetic Resources 9:134-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479262110000444
Bioversity International; Rural Development Administration (2009). A training module for the international course on plant genetic resources and genebank management. Retrieved 2014 February 21 from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105129
Bland JM, Altman DG (1996). Transforming data. British Medical Journal 312:770. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7033.770
Canavar Ö, Kaynak MA (2013). Determination of yield and yield components and seed quality of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) at different harvest times. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 4(S):3791-3803.
Carter ET, Rowland DL, Tillman BL, Erickson JE, Grey TL, Gillett-Kaufman JL, Clark MW (2017). Pod maturity in the shelling process. Peanut Science 44(1):26-35. https://doi.org/10.3146/PS16-17.1
Cattan P, Letourmy P, Zagré B, Minougou A, Compaoré EN (2001). Rendement de l'arachide et du sorgho en rotation sous différents itinéraires techniques au Burkina Faso [Yield of peanut and sorghum in rotation under different technical itineraries in Burkina Faso]. Cahiers Agricultures 10(3):177-186.
Chen T, Zhang J, Wang X, Zeng R, Chen Y, Zhang H, Wan S, Zhang L (2021). Monoseeding increases peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield by regulating shade-avoidance responses and population density. Plants 10:2405. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10112405
Chevalier A (1929). L'origine botanique et l'amélioration des Arachides cultivées (Suite et fin) [The botanical origin and improvement of cultivated peanuts (continued and conclusion)]. Revue de Botanique Appliquée et d'Agriculture Coloniale 9(91):190-197. https://doi.org/10.3406/jatba.1929.4720
Cholastová T, Knotová D (2012). Using morphological and microsatellite (SSR) markers to assess the genetic diversity in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). International Journal of Biology 6(9):781-787. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1075471
Chu Y, Marasigan KM, Guimaraes LA, Holbrook CC, Hovav R, Ozias-Akins P (2022). Phenotypic variation of component traits affecting maturity in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science 49(2):1-11. https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679-492-PS21-18
Çiftçi S, Suna G (2022). Functional components of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.) and health benefits: a review. Future Foods 5:100140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fufo.2022.100140
Custódio AR, Seijo G, Valls JFM (2013). Characterization of Brazilian accessions of wild Arachis species of section Arachis (Fabaceae) using heterochromatin detection and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Genetics and Molecular Biology 36:364-370. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572013000300011
Daudi H, Shimelis H, Laing M, Okori P, Mponda O (2018). Groundnut production constraints, farming systems, and farmer preferred traits in Tanzania. Journal of Crop Improvement 32(6):812-828. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2018.1531801
De Godoy IJ, Norden AJ (1981). Shell and seed size relationships in peanuts. Peanut Science 8(1):21-24. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-8-1-6
Dima M, Drăghici R, Coteț G, Netcu F, Băjenaru M-F (2023). Research on the influence of harvest time on yield in groundnuts grown on sandy soils. Scientific Papers Series A - Agronomy 66(2):181-186.
Djeghim H, Bellil I (2021). Genetic diversity of the Algerian peanut population analyzed using morphological markers and seed storage proteins. Proceedings on Applied Botany Genetics and Breeding 182(3):111-124. https://doi.org/10.30901/2227-8834-2021-3-111-124
Djeghim H, Bellil I, Boudchicha RH, Boumegoura A, Khelifi D (2021). First records on genetic diversity and population structure of Algerian peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using microsatellite markers. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 40:136-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11105-021-01305-7
Drout M, Smith L (2012). Reading dendrograms. Wheaton College Lexomics Project. Retrieved 2026 March 11 from https://wheatoncollege.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/How-to-Read-a-Dendrogram-Web-Ready.pdf
Essomba NB, Coffelt TA (1992). Growth habit in peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L.): a comparative analysis of F2 progenies. Oléagineux Corps Gras Lipides 47(12):705-711. Retrieved 2015 December 18 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255962236
FAOSTAT (2024). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division. Retrieved 2024 June 14 from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
Feng C, Sun Z, Zhang L, Feng L, Zheng J, Bai W, Gu C, Wang Q, Xu Z, van der Werf W (2021). Maize/peanut intercropping increases land productivity: a meta-analysis. Field Crops Research 270:108208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108208
Ferguson ME, Bramel PJ, Chandra S (2004). Gene diversity among botanical varieties in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Crop Science 44:1847-1854. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.1847
Florkowski WJ (1994). Groundnut production and trade. In: Smartt J (Ed). The Groundnut Crop: A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, London pp 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0733-4_1
Gedifew S (2024). Trait correlations and path analysis for kernel yield improvement in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering 12(4):105-112. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20241204.14
Gibbons RW, Bunting AH, Smartt J (1972). The classification of varieties of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Euphytica 21:78-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00040550
Giuffrè AM, Tellah S, Capocasale M, Zappia C, Latati M, Badiani M, Ounane SM (2016). Seed oil from ten Algerian peanut landraces for edible use and biodiesel production. Journal of Oleo Science 65(1):9-20. https://doi.org/10.5650/jos.ess15199
Gorné LD, Díaz SM, Minden V, Onoda Y, Kramer K, Muir CD, Michaletz ST, Lavorel S, Sharpe JM, Jansen S, Slot M, Chacón-Madrigal E, Boenisch G. 2022. The acquisitive–conservative axis of leaf trait variation emerges even in homogeneous environments. Annals of Botany 129:709-722. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa198
Gower JC (1971). A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties. Biometrics 27(4):857-71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2528823
Grandawa MM (2014). Characterisation of physico-chemical properties of Arachis hypogaea L. shells (groundnut) as environmental remediation. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Sciences (ICCBES'14), 12-13 May 2014, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved 2025 April 24 from https://bryanhousepub.org/src/static/pdf/JRSE-2019-1-3_3.pdf
Gregory NC, Krapovickas A, Gregory MP (1980). Structural variation, evolution and classification in Arachis. In: Advances in Legume Science. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK pp 469-481. https://eurekamag.com/research/000/988/000988285.php
Gulluoglu L, Bakal H, Onat B, Kurt C, Arioglu H (2017). Comparison of agronomic and quality characteristics of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties grown as main and double crop in Mediterranean region. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 22(2):166-177. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.356208
Guo B, Chen CY, Chu Y, Holbrook CC Jr, Ozias-Akins P, Stalker HT (2011). Advances in genetics and genomics for sustainable peanut production. In: Benkeblia N (Ed). Sustainable Agriculture and New Biotechnologies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1201/b10977-16
Halward TM, Stalker HT, Larue EA, Kochert G (1991). Genetic variation detectable with molecular markers among unadapted germplasm resources of cultivated peanut and related wild species. Genome 34:1013-1020. https://doi.org/10.1139/g91-156
Hammons RO (1963). Artificial cross-pollination of the peanut with bee-collected pollen. Crop Science 3:562-563. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1963.0011183X000300060036x
Hammons RO (1973). Genetics of Arachis hypogaea. In: Peanuts: Culture and Uses. American Peanut Research and Education Association pp 135-173. Retrieved 2015 May 9 from https://apresinc.com/images/2015/12/PCU-Chapter-4.pdf
Heuzé V, Thiollet H, Tran G, Lebas F (2017). Peanut forage. Feedipedia, a programme by INRAE, CIRAD, AFZ and FAO. Retrieved 2025 December 18 from https://www.feedipedia.org/node/695
Holbrook CC, Stalker HT (2003). Peanut breeding and genetic resources. Plant Breeding Reviews 22:297-356. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470650202.ch6
Husted L (1931). Chromosome numbers in species of peanut Arachis. American Naturalist 65:476-477. https://doi.org/10.1086/280391
IBPGR/IBPGR (1992). International Board for Plant Genetic Resources (IBPGR), International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) (1992). Descriptors for groundnut. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources. Retrieved 2014 February 18 from https://cgspace.cgiar.org/items/e6119f6a-89d5
Iddrisu A, Adjei E, Asomaning SK, Santo KG, Isaac AP, Danson-Anokye A (2024). Effect of variety and plant spacing on growth and yield of groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L.). Agricultural Sciences 15:54-70. https://doi.org/10.4236/as.2024.151004
INRAA (2006). Deuxième rapport national sur l'état des ressources phytogénétiques [Second national report on the state of plant genetic resources]. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique d'Algérie (INRAA). Retrieved 2019 June 19 from https://www.fao.org/4/i1500e/Algeria.pdf
International Trade Centre (ITC) (2025). Trade Map: Trade statistics for international business development. Retrieved 2025 August 9 from https://www.trademap.org
Jajuga K, Walesiak M (2000). Standardisation of data set under different measurement scales. In: Decker R, Gaul W (Eds). Classification and Information Processing at the Turn of the Millennium. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 105-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57280-7_11
Janila P, Nigam SN (2013). Phenotyping for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) improvement. In: Kang MS (Ed). Quantitative genetics, genomics and plant breeding. 2nd ed. Wallingford: CABI pp 129-167.
Jannat S, Mahmood ul Hassan, Muhammad Kausar Nawaz Shah (2022). Genetic improvement of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes by developing short duration hybrids. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 29(4):3033-3039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.032
Jogloy C, Jaisil P, Akkasaeng C, Kesmala T, Jogloy S (2011). Heritability and correlation for maturity and pod yield in peanut. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 7(2):134-140. Retrieved 2025 August 9 from https://www.aensiweb.com/old/jasr/jasr/2011/134-140.pdf
Knauft DA, Chiyembekeza AJ, Gorbet DW (1992). Possible reproductive factors contributing to outcrossing in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science 19(1):29-31. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-19-1-7
Kochert G, Stalker HT, Gimenes M, Galgaro L, Romero Lopes C, Moore K (1996). RFLP and cytogenetic evidence on the origin and evolution of allotetraploid domesticated peanut, Arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae). American Journal of Botany 83(10):1282-1291. https://doi.org/10.2307/2446112
Kraimat M, Bissati S (2017). Characterization of genotypic variability associated to the phosphorus bioavailability in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Annals of Agricultural Sciences, Sciences 62(1):49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2017.01.004
Krapovickas A, Gregory WC (1994). Taxonomía del género Arachis (Leguminosae) [Taxonomy of the genus Arachis (Leguminosae)]. Bonplandia 8: 1-186. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.81-43559
Krapovickas A, Gregory WC (2007). Taxonomy of the genus Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 16:1-205. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.160158
Kunta S, Parimi P, Levy Y, Kottakota C, Chedvat I, Chu Y, Ozias-Akins P, Hovav R (2022). A first insight into the genetics of maturity trait in Runner × Virginia types peanut background. Scientific Reports 12:15267. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19653-z
Lavia GI, Fernández A (2004). Karyotypic studies in Arachis hypogaea L. varieties. Caryologia 57(4):353-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2004.10589416
Leal-Bertioli SCM, Godoy IJ, Santos JF, Doyle JJ, Guimarães PM, Abernathy BL, Jackson SA, Moretzsohn MC, Bertioli DJ (2018). Segmental allopolyploidy in action: increasing diversity through polyploid hybridization and homoeologous recombination. American Journal of Botany 105(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1112
Lee TA Jr, Ketring DL, Powell RD (1972). Flowering and growth response of peanut plants (Arachis hypogaea L. var. Starr) at two levels of relative humidity. Plant Physiology 49(2):190-193. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.49.2.190
Li W, Liu N, Huang L, Chen Y, Guo J, Yu B, Luo H, Zhou X, Huai D, Chen W, Yan L, Wang X, Lei Y, Liao B, Jiang H (2022). Stable major QTL on chromosomes A07 and A08 increase shelling percentage in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The Crop Journal 10(3):820-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2021.12.011
Lima MS, Carneiro JE, Carneiro PCS, Pereira CS, Vieira RF, Cecon PR (2012). Characterization of genetic variability among common bean genotypes by morphological descriptors. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 12(1):76-84. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1984-70332012000100010
Liu Z, Nan Z-W, Lin S-M, Yu H-Q, Xie L-Y, Meng W-W, Zhang Z, Wan S-B (2023). Millet/peanut intercropping at a moderate N rate increases crop productivity and N use efficiency, as well as economic benefits, under rain-fed conditions. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 22(3):738-751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2022.08.078
MADR (2025). Peanut production statistics, 2000-2022 season [Unpublished Excel data set]. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Directorate of Statistics, Digitalization and Foresight. Received 2025, May 20 (Used with permission).
Maggioni L, Georgiev S, Lipman E (2004). Arachis genetic resources in Europe. Ad hoc meeting, 15-16 November 2002, Plovdiv, Bulgaria. European Cooperative Programme for Plant Genetic Resources; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. Retrieved 2014 September 28 from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/105060
Mahmoud MWSh, Hussein E, Ashour K (2020). Sequential path analysis for determining the interrelationships between yield and its components in peanut. Egyptian Journal of Agronomy 42(1):83-96. https://doi.org/10.21608/agro.2020.21968.1201
Mallikarjuna N, Varshney RK (2014). Genetics, genomics and breeding of peanut: an introduction. In: Mallikarjuna N, Varshney RK (Eds). Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Peanuts. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16872
Manaa I, Djebbar R, Abrous-Belbachir O (2019). Impact of exogenous alpha tocopherol on peanut seedlings (Arachis hypogaea L.) treated by norflurazon. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 63(2):125-133. https://doi.org/10.14232/abs.2019.2.125-133
Maracahipes L, Carlucci MB, Lenza E, Marimon BS, Marimon BH, Guimarães FAG, Cianciaruso MV (2018). How to live in contrasting habitats? Acquisitive and conservative strategies emerge at inter- and intraspecific levels in savanna and forest woody plants. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34:17-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppees.2018.07.006
Milligan GW, Cooper MC (1988). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification 5:181-204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01897163
Mohamad IB, Usman D (2013). Standardization and its effects on K-means clustering algorithm. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 6(17):3299-3303. https://doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.6.3638
Moss JP, Ramanatha Rao V (1995). The peanut-reproductive development to plant maturity. In: Pattee HE, Stalker HT (Eds). Advances in Peanut Science. American Peanut Research and Education Society, Stillwater, Oklahoma, pp 1-13. Received 2016, March 11 https://apresinc.com/images/2015/12/APS-Chapter-1.pdf
Mukhtar AA, Babaji BA, Ibrahim S, Mani H, Mohammad AA, Ibrahim A (2013). Dry matter production and harvest index of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) varieties under irrigation. Journal of Agricultural Science 5(8):153-162. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v5n8p153
Olayinka BU, Yusuf BT, Etejer EO (2015). Growth, yield and proximate composition of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as influenced by land preparation methods. Notulae Scientia Biologicae 7(2):135-140. https://doi.org/10.15835/nsb729499
Oliva-Cruz M, Cabañas-López JR, Altamirano-Tantalean MA, Juarez-Contreras L, Vigo CN (2024). Agronomic behavior of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) cultivars under three planting densities in the northeast of Peru. Agronomy 14(9):1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy14091905
Oliveira JT, Oliveira RA, Cunha FF, Silva PA, Teodoro PE (2022). Commercial classification of peanuts based on pod physical characteristics. Engenharia Agrícola 42:e20220018. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v42n5e20220018
Osawaru ME, Ogwu MC, Aiwansoba RO (2015). Hierarchical approaches to the analysis of genetic diversity in plants: A systematic overview. University of Mauritius Research Journal 21:36-71. Retrieved 2024 August 21 from https://docslib.org/download/6604716/1-hierarchical-approaches-to-the-analysis-of-genetic-diversity
Oteng-Frimpong R, Konlan SP, Denwar NN (2017). Evaluation of selected groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) lines for yield and haulm nutritive quality traits. International Journal of Agronomy 2017:7479309. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7479309
Pattee HE, Stalker HT, Giesbrecht FG (1991). Comparative peg, ovary and ovule ontogeny of selected cultivated and wild-type Arachis species. Botanical Gazette 152(1):64-71. Retrieved 2018 January 11 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/2995492
Peñaloza A, Valls JFM (2005). Chromosome number and satellite chromosome morphology of eleven species of Arachis (Leguminosae). Bonplandia 14:65-72. Retrieved 2014 March 11 from https://revistas.unne.edu.ar/index.php/bon/article/download/1388/1160/3846
Pittman RN (1995). United States peanut descriptors. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, ARS-132:18. Retrieved 2013 April 23 from https://archive.org/details/IND20479053
Postigo Á, Juarros-Basterretxea J, Alonso-Diego G, Montes-Álvarez P, Menéndez-Aller Á, García-Cueto E (2024). Post-hoc tests in one-way ANOVA: the case for normal distribution. Methodology 20(2):84-99. https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.11721
Purnomo P, Khotimah N (2019). Variations and phenetic analysis of peanut cultivars (Arachis hypogaea L.) based on morphological characteristics. Journal of Tropical Biodiversity and Biotechnology 4:24-31. https://doi.org/10.22146/jtbb.39390
Putnam DH, Oplinger ES, Teynor TM, Oelke EA, Kelling KA, Doll JD (1991). Peanut. In: Alternative Field Crops Manual. Purdue University, West Lafayette. Retrieved 2012 April 12 from https://hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/afcm/peanut.html
Rami J-F, Leal-Bertioli SCM, Foncéka D, Moretzsohn MC, Bertioli DJ (2014). Groundnut. In: Pratap A, Kumar J (Eds). Alien gene transfer in crop plants, volume 2: achievements and impacts. Springer, New York pp 253-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9572-7_12
Rao RV, Murty UR (1994). Botany—morphology and anatomy. In: Smartt J (Ed). The groundnut crop - a scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, London pp 43-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0733-4_3
Richardson JTE (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review 6(2):135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001
Ruxton GD, Beauchamp G (2008). Time for some a priori thinking about post hoc testing. Behavioral Ecology 19(3):690-693. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn020
Salama FSMG (2024). Maximizing productivity and quality of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) by proper phosphorus fertilizer level and zinc application time. Zagazig Journal of Agricultural Research 51(4):663-674. https://doi.org/10.21608/zjar.2024.380607
Salkind NJ (Ed) (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
Santana SH, Valls JFM (2015). Arachis veigae (Fabaceae), the most dispersed wild species of the genus, and yet taxonomically overlooked. Bonplandia 24(2):139-150. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.242238
Seijo JG, Atahuachi M, Simpson CE, Krapovickas A (2021). Arachis inflata: a new B genome species of Arachis (Fabaceae). Bonplandia 30(2):1-6. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.3024942
Sharma KK, Bhatnagar-Mathur P (2006). Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Methods in Molecular Biology 343:347-358. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59745-130-4:347
Sher A, Kashif M, Sattar A, Qayyum A, Ul-Allah S, Nawaz A, Manaf A (2019). Characterization of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) germplasm for morphological and quality traits in an arid environment. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 24(2):132-137. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.615176
Simpson CE, Valls JFM, Mies JW (1993). Reproductive biology and the potential for genetic recombination in Arachis. In: Kerridge PC, Hardy B (Eds). Biology and agronomy of forage Arachis. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, CO pp 43-52. Retrieved 2014 October 26 from https://hdl.handle.net/10568/54359
Singh AK, Nigam SN (2016). Arachis gene pools and genetic improvement in groundnut. In: Rajpal VR, Rao SR, Raina SN (Eds). Gene pool diversity and crop improvement. Springer, Cham pp 17-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27096-8_2
Smartt J, Stalker HT (1982). Speciation and cytogenetics in Arachis. In: Pattee HE, Young CT (Eds). Peanut science and technology. American Peanut Research and Education Society pp 21-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60801-9
Smith BW (1950). Arachis hypogaea: aerial flower and subterranean fruit. American Journal of Botany 37(10):802-815. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1950.tb11073.x
Smýkal P, Coyne CJ, Ambrose MJ, Maxted N, Schaefer H, Blair MW, … Varshney RK (2015). Legume crops phylogeny and genetic diversity for science and breeding. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 34(1-3):43-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2014.897904
Stalker HT, Simpson CE (1995). Germplasm resources in Arachis. In: Pattee HE, Stalker HT (Eds). Advances in Peanut Science. American Peanut Research and Education Society, Stillwater, OK, pp 14-53. Retrieved 2014 October 26 from https://apresinc.com/images/2015/12/APS-Chapter-2.pdf
Swinscow TDV, Campbell MJ (2003). Statistics at square one (10th ed). Viva Books Private Limited, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1136/pmj.78.921.444-b
Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed). Pearson, Boston, MA. Retrieved 2019 November 1 from https://www.pearsonhighered.com/assets/preface/0/1/3/4/0134790545.pdfpearsonhighered
Tallah S, Badiani M, Trifilò P, Lo Gullo MA, Ounane G, Ounane SM, Sorgonà A (2014). Morpho-physiological traits contributing to water stress tolerance in a peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) landraces collection from the Algerian Maghreb. Agrochimica 58(2):126-147.
Templeton GF (2011). A two-step approach for transforming continuous variables to normal: implications and recommendations for IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 28:41-58. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.02804
Templeton GF, Burney LL (2017). Using a two-step transformation to address non-normality from a business value of information technology perspective. Journal of Information Systems 31(2):149-164. https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51510
UPOV (2014). Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) - guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability (DUS), TG/93/4 (final). International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva. Retrieved 2015 March 9 from https://www.upov.int/edocs/tgdocs/en/tg093.pdf
Valls JFM, Simpson CE (2005). New species of Arachis (Leguminosae) from Brazil, Paraguay and Bolivia. Bonplandia 14(1-2):35-63. https://doi.org/10.30972/bon.141-21387
Williams DE (2022). Global strategy for the conservation and use of peanut genetic resources. Global Crop Diversity Trust, Bonn, Germany. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7545106
Williams EJ, Drexler JS (1981). A non-destructive method for determining peanut pod maturity. Peanut Science 8(2):134-141. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-8-2-15
Zaidi PH (2019). Management of drought stress in field phenotyping. CIMMYT, Mexico. Retrieved 2026 March 16 from https://excellenceinbreeding.org/toolbox/tools/management-drought-stress-field-phenotyping
Zanklan AS, Becker HC, Sørensen M, Pawelzik E, Grüneberg WJ (2018). Genetic diversity in cultivated yam bean (Pachyrhizus spp.) evaluated through multivariate analysis of morphological and agronomic traits. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 65:811-843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-017-0582-5
Zhang S, Hu X, Wang F, Miao H, Ye C, Yang W, Zhong W, Chen J (2025). Identification of QTLs for plant height and branching-related traits in cultivated peanut. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 24(7):2511-2524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jia.2023.12.009
Zhao Y, Prakash CS, He G, Liang X, Varshney RK, Liao B (2017). Genetic variation and association mapping of seed-related traits in cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) using single-locus simple sequence repeat markers. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:2105. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02105
Zheng Z, Sun Z, Qi F, Fang Y, Lin K, Pavan S, Huang B, Dong W, Du P, Tian M, Shi L, Xu J, Han S, Liu H, Qin L, Zhang Z, Dai X, Miao L, Zhao R, Wang J, Liao Y, Li A, Ruan J, Delvento C, Zhang X (2024). Chloroplast and whole-genome sequencing shed light on the evolutionary history and phenotypic diversification of peanuts. Nature Genetics 56:1975-1984. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-024-01876-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Said CHAFAI, Sidi-Mohamed OUNANE, Ouzna ABROUS-BELBACHIR

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Papers published in Notulae Scientia Biologicae are Open-Access, distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License.
© Articles by the authors; licensee SMTCT, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright/to retain publishing rights without restriction.
License:
Open Access Journal - the journal offers free, immediate, and unrestricted access to peer-reviewed research and scholarly work, due SMTCT supports to increase the visibility, accessibility and reputation of the researchers, regardless of geography. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.







.png)













