Osmoprotective mechanisms of compatible solutes in Enterococcus faecium LBO1 isolated from traditional Algerian Lben

Authors

  • Ikram Imene BEKKAYE Oran 1 University Ahmed Ben Bella, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Laboratory of Microorganisms Biology and Biotechnology, Oran (DZ) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7236-8467
  • Faiza BOUBLENZA Oran 1 University Ahmed Ben Bella, Faculty of Natural and Life Sciences, Department of Biotechnology, Laboratory of Microorganisms Biology and Biotechnology, Oran (DZ) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0934-2424

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55779/nsb17412750

Keywords:

compatible solutes uptake, Enterococcus faecium, intracellular metabolites analysis, membrane lipid remodelling, osmoadaptation, osmotic stress

Abstract

This study investigated the osmoadaptation strategies of Enterococcus faecium strains isolated from traditional Algerian dairy products, focusing on their potential as starter cultures for food industry. In this context, eleven isolates were confirmed as E. faecium (16S rRNA, 99.8%). The strain LBO1 showed the highest salt tolerance, growing at 9.5% (w/v) NaCl with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 10% (w/v). Its response to hyperosmotic stress was evaluated with five compatible solutes: proline, sodium glutamate, sorbitol, mannitol, and maltose. Our findings indicate proline and sodium glutamate (0.12% w/v) significantly enhanced growth and viability. GC–MS profiling revealed intracellular accumulation of trehalose and sorbitol, while lipid analysis showed a 2.3-fold increase in unsaturated fatty acids and the appearance of cyclic fatty acids. Increased cell surface hydrophobicity indicated membrane remodelling under stress. Principal component analysis highlighted the combined contribution of solute uptake and membrane lipid adjustments to salt tolerance. These findings demonstrate that E. faecium LBO1 adapts to osmotic stress through compatible solutes and membrane reorganisation, supporting its potential as a safe and effective culture for saline dairy fermentations.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abedini R, Zaghari G, Jabbari L, Salekdeh GH, Hashemi M (2023). A potential probiotic Enterococcus faecium isolated from camel rumen, fatty acids biotransformation, antilisteria activity and safety assessment. International Dairy Journal 145:105706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idairyj.2023.105706

Baghdad-Belhadj FZ, Boublenza F, Karam NE (2019). Stress tolerance in Lactobacillus plantarum LMF6 isolated from human breast milk. South Asian Journal of Experimental Biology 9:173-184. https://doi.org/10.38150/sajeb.9(5).p173-184

Beales N (2004). Adaptation of microorganisms to cold temperatures, weak acid preservatives, low pH, and osmotic stress: a review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 3(1):1-20 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2004.tb00057.x

Boublenza F, Zaddi-Karam H, Karam NE (2011). Physiological responses to salt stress and osmoprotection with proline in two strains of lactococci isolated from camel’s milk in Southern Algeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 10:19429-19435. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB11.1807

Chae SR, Ahn YT, Kang ST, Shin HS (2006). Mitigated membrane fouling in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR). Journal of Membrane Science 280:572-581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.02.015

Chaida A, Chebbi A, Bensalah F, Franzetti A (2021). Isolation and characterization of a novel rhamnolipid producer Pseudomonas sp. LGMS7 from a highly contaminated site in Ain El Arbaa region of Ain Temouchent, Algeria. 3 Biotech 11:15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-021-02751-6

Elbein AD, Pan YT, Pastuszak I, Carroll D (2003). New insights on trehalose: A multifunctional molecule. Glycobiology 13:17R-27R. https://doi.org/10.1093/glycob/cwg047

Gołaś-Prądzyńska M, Łuszczyńska M, Rola JG (2022). Dairy Products: A Potential Source of Multidrug-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium Strains. Foods 11(24):4116. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11244116

Guillot A, Gonzy-Treboul G, Béchét M (2000). Fatty acid membrane composition and activation of glycine-betaine transport in Lactococcus lactis subjected to osmotic stress. International Journal of Food Microbiology 55(1-3):47-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(00)00193-8

Hall TA (1999). BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95-98.

Heo S, Lee J, Lee JH, Jeong DW (2019). Genomic insight into the salt tolerance of Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis and Tetragenococcus halophilus. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 29:1591-1602. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1908.08015

Jeong, M., Jeong, D. W., & Lee, J. H. (2015). Safety and biotechnological properties of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from Meju. Journal of the Korean Society for Applied Biological Chemistry 58(6), 813-820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-015-0110-2

Kets E, Teunissen P, de Bont J (1996). Effect of compatible solutes on survival of lactic acid bacteria subjected to drying. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 62(1):259-261. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.62.1.259-261.1996

Kimura M (1980). A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. Journal of Molecular Evolution 16:111-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01731581

Kraegeloh A, Amendt B, Kunte HJ (2005). Potassium transport in a halophilic member of the bacteria domain: Identification and characterization of the K⁺ uptake systems TrkH and TrkI from Halomonas elongata DSM 2581T. Journal of Bacteriology 187:1036-1043. https://doi.org/10.1128/jb.187.3.1036-1043.2005

Maidak BL, Cole JR, Lilburn TG, Parker CT Jr, Saxman PR, Stredwick JM, Garrity GM, Li B, Olsen GJ, Pramanik S, Schmidt TM, Tiedje JM (2000). The RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) continues. Nucleic Acids Research 28:173-174. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/28.1.173

Pham HT, Nhiep NTH, Vu TNM, Huynh TN, Zhu Y, Huynh ALD, Chakrabortti A, Marcellin E, Lo R, Howard CB, Bansal N, Woodward JJ, Liang ZX, Turner MS (2018). Enhanced uptake of potassium or glycine betaine or export of cyclic-di-AMP restores osmoresistance in a high cyclic-di-AMP Lactococcus lactis mutant. PLoS Genetics 14:e1007574. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007574

Šalomskienė J, Abraitienė A, Jonkuvienė D, Mačionienė I, Repečkienė J, Stankienė J, Vaičiulytė-Funk L (2015). Changes in antagonistic activity of lactic acid bacteria induced by their response to technological factors. Agricultural and Food Science 24(4):289-299. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.50936

Sasser M (1990). Bacterial identification by gas chromatographic analysis of fatty acid methyl esters (GC-FAME). MIDI Inc., Technical Note #101.

Serrazanetti DI, Guerzoni ME, Corsetti A, Vogel R (2009). Metabolic impact and potential exploitation of the stress reactions in lactobacilli. Food Microbiology 26:700-711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2009.07.007

Sleator RD, Hill C (2002). Bacterial osmoadaptation: The role of osmolytes in bacterial stress and virulence. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 26:49-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00598.x

Suutari M, Laakso S (1994). Microbial fatty acids and thermal adaptation. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 20:285-328. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408419409113560

Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021). MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38:3022-3027. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120

Terzaghi BE, Sandine WE (1975). Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Applied Microbiology 29:807-813. https://doi.org/10.1128/am.29.6.807-813.1975

Tian X, Wang Y, Chu J, Zhuang Y, Zhang S (2016). Enhanced L-lactic acid production in Lactobacillus paracasei by exogenous proline addition based on comparative metabolite profiling analysis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 100:2301-2310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-7136-6

To TM, Grandvalet C, Tourdot-Maréchal R (2011). Cyclopropanation of membrane unsaturated fatty acids is not essential to the acid stress response of Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 77:3327-3334. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02518-10

Van Loosdrecht MC, Lyklema J, Norde W, Schraa G, Zehnder AJ (1987). The role of bacterial cell wall hydrophobicity in adhesion. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53:1893-1897. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.53.8.1893-1897.1987

Zanzan M, Ezzaky Y, Achemchem F, Hamadi F, Valero A, Mamouni R (2023). Fermentative optimization and characterization of exopolysaccharides from Enterococcus faecium F58 isolated from traditional fresh goat cheese. Food Science and Biotechnology 33(5):1195-1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-023-01424-9

Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu Y, Mao S, Li Y (2010). Proteomic analyses to reveal the protective role of glutathione in resistance of Lactococcus lactis to osmotic stress. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:3177-3186. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02942-09

Zotta T, Ricciardi A, Ciocia F, Rossano R, Parente E (2008). Diversity of stress responses in dairy thermophilic streptococci. International Journal of Food Microbiology 124(1):34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.02.024

Downloads

Published

2025-12-16

How to Cite

BEKKAYE, I. I., & BOUBLENZA, F. (2025). Osmoprotective mechanisms of compatible solutes in Enterococcus faecium LBO1 isolated from traditional Algerian Lben. Notulae Scientia Biologicae, 17(4), 12750. https://doi.org/10.55779/nsb17412750

Issue

Section

Research articles
CITATION
DOI: 10.55779/nsb17412750